Testimony

Photo: Pixabay

Testimony of Jonathan Imbody

May 25, 2006

Testimony of Jonathan Imbody
Christian Medical Association
U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights

May 25, 2006

Senators, thank you for the privilege of testifying today.
I serve as Senior Policy Analyst with the Christian Medical Association, a professional
organization of 17,000 members.

I spent several months in the Netherlands a few years ago researching personal accounts of
euthanasia.

I knew from published medical studies that Dutch doctors admitted, on condition of anonymity,
to putting approximately 1,000 patients to death a year without the patients' request.i
I interviewed Dr. Zbigniew Zylicz, a Polish-born internal medicine and oncology specialist who
has practiced in the Netherlands since 1979.
Dr. Zylich told me about his experience with an elderly patient in an academic hospital:
He said, "[My patient] was afraid to go to the hospital because she
was afraid of euthanasia. She was not asking for this; she did not
even want this. And they promised her that nothing would happen to
her.

“I admitted her on the weekend to a bed of another patient who would
be coming back Monday morning. I had no other facility for her. She
was very ill, and I expected she would die on the weekend.
"But she improved. With good treatment and pain control, she started
to talk and she was not dead.”
“On Monday morning when I went off from my shift and went home, my
colleague came and did something. I don’t know exactly what he did,
but she died within ten minutes. And the nurses called me at home.
They were very upset about this. And I was very upset about this,
too.
Dr. Zylich added, "And this was not the only single case. This was
the whole system working like this."
The Dutch have a lot of faith in their dikes and in their regulations. But euthanasia introduces
dangerous gray areas of decision making by doctors and by vulnerable patients who feel
pressured to die. These gray areas defy regulation.
I interviewed a Dutch couple, Ed and Xandra, who told me about Ed's father, Franz.
Franz was a Dutch sailor who had reluctantly entered the hospital for pain relief. Doctors
discovered that Franz had a terminal illness.
Franz's son Ed recalls, “We were all invited to the hospital when
[the doctors] said the diagnosis. The doctors told my Dad, ‘Well,
you don’t have too long to live. We can’t guarantee anything, but if
we operate, you could live longer and have more time to be with your
kids.’”
Ed recalls, “When the doctors left, my sister said it very bluntly,
just putting it on the table: ‘What about euthanasia?’ she said.”
Franz's wife did not protest. Xandra suggests that's because Franz's wife was angry with him and
thought Franz had been unfaithful in their marriage.
So Franz agreed to euthanasia.

Xandra remembers the day the doctor came to put her father-in-law to death.
“[The doctor] had all those little vials," Xandra recalls, "and she
had two injections—one to put him to sleep, and one for the killing
part.
“She was very, ‘OK, I need to do this now.’ Probably she had another
appointment after that.
“Then she started injecting him,” Xandra recalls.
“While she was giving the injection, I was standing at [my fatherin-law's]
feet. He was really looking at me and at our baby—I was
holding the baby at the time.”
Then, Xandra says, her father-in-law suddenly cried out.
He said, “I don’t want to die!”
Xandra frantically looked to the doctor and at the others in the room.
"But no one was reacting,” she recalls.
She didn't know what to do.
"And then," she says, “he was … like he was in a deep sleep. So then
the doctor started getting the other injection. Then I left the
room.”
Franz died from that second injection, whether he really wanted to or not.
Once a country casts off millennia of Hippocratic and Judeo-Christian prohibitions against
suicide and euthanasia, the ship drifts farther and farther out to sea with no anchor.
If we assume the power to kill patients who ask for it, why not kill disabled patients who cannot
ask for it? If we assume the power to kill patients with physical illnesses, why not kill patients
with emotional illnesses? If we assume the power to kill the elderly who have medical problems,
why not kill infants who have medical problems?
This slippery slope is not theoretical; this is exactly what has happened in the Netherlands.ii,iii,iv
And it can happen anywhere, unless we provide truly compassionate alternatives to statesponsored
suicide:
 More doctors need advanced training in palliative care.
 In certain cases, more aggressive pain-relief prescribing regulations will help doctors provide
more effective relief for patients.
 Hospice care can provide tremendous benefits for patients and families.
Perhaps the most important help for terminally ill patients transcends medicine. The
unconditional, persevering love of family, friends and God can provide us with incomparable
strength, courage and hope beyond our physical condition.
Thank you.

REFERENCES
i
Paul J. van der Maas, et. al., "Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Other Medical Practices Involving the
End of Life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995," New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 335:1699-1705 November
28, 1996 Number 22; Table 1. Basing calculations on data from surveys of physicians under promise of anonymity,
authors account for between .5% and .8% of 135,546 (thus totaling between 678 and 1,084) deaths in the
Netherlands were attributable to "Ending of life without patient's explicit request."
ii "Dutch take courage in debate on euthanasia," The Times of London, 2/26/00.
"Controversial cases have tested the boundaries of euthanasia's application, none more so than that of a 25-yearold
woman who had suffered anorexia for 15 years and who had been in hospital and through therapy without
success. She repeatedly begged her doctor to help her die and threatened violent suicide if he would not. She
went so far as to videotape her plea for euthanasia and the doctor agreed."
"Professor Paul van der Maas, who led the first study into his country's euthanasia policy, said…"Euthanasia is
not given to spare pain, it is to preserve a patient's dignity."
iii "Hospital performs euthanasia on infants," Associated Press, 11/30/2004.
"A hospital in the Netherlands — the first nation to permit euthanasia — has proposed guidelines for mercy
killings of terminally ill newborns and then made a startling revelation: It already has begun carrying out such
procedures, which include administering a lethal dose of sedatives."
iv Eduard Verhagen, M.D., J.D., and Pieter J.J. Sauer, M.D., Ph.D., "The Groningen Protocol — Euthanasia in
Severely Ill Newborns," The New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 352:959-962 March 10, 2005 Number 10.

Commentary