ARTICLE
Vaccines and Conscience Protection
It has been over a year since the first diagnosis of COVID-19 in the United States. Due to this pandemic's effects, our society has experienced limitations in personal freedoms to a level we have never known. Social interactions and work environments have been changed by social distancing, masks, hospital and nursing home visitation restrictions and
It has been over a year since the first diagnosis of COVID-19 in the United States. Due to this pandemic's effects, our society has experienced limitations in personal freedoms to a level we have never known. Social interactions and work environments have been changed by social distancing, masks, hospital and nursing home visitation restrictions and working from home. Freedom of movement about our communities and the nation has been limited by "stay-at-home orders" and mass travel restrictions. The availability of vaccines provides a sliver of hope but also raises many questions. Issues our society must address include prioritizing equitable vaccine distribution and the potential for coercive mandates on vaccine use.
Government agencies and other organizations are responsible for developing strategies for efficient and equitable distribution of vaccines.
The highest priority is the vaccination of those at greatest medical risk and those directly involved in the care of the sick. Once this has been accomplished, distribution can be directed toward those at lesser risk of serious disease. Attention should also be given to making vaccines available to smaller independent hospitals and clinics serving in underserved and rural areas where the vaccines to date have been less available.
Governing authorities must respect an individual's right to accept or decline a vaccine.
There is no justifiable moral obligation to accept vaccination. If a vaccine has been developed, tested, or produced with technology that an individual deems morally unacceptable, such as the use of abortion-derived fetal cell lines, vaccine refusal is morally acceptable. An individual’s decision to be vaccinated will also depend upon their personal assessment of the medical risks, a choice that should be respected. The decision not to be vaccinated must be accompanied by a commitment to take necessary precautions to lessen disease transmission.
Finally, the protection of First Amendment rights is imperative.
It is fundamental that the right of individual conscience be preserved. Coerced vaccination would irreparably harm Constitutional rights and the patient-physician relationship. Conscience is an individual belief influenced by many factors such as faith, culture, family, and reason. Each individual makes a conscientious decision in any given situation. Respect for conscience rights is always of primary importance.
The Covid-19 pandemic has challenged our nation for over a year. It has brought to light new challenges regarding disease management as well as threats to individual liberties. While the logistical challenges alone are significant, we must not ignore the ethical concerns regarding vaccine manufacturing, distribution and administration. While the pandemic remains a significant public health crisis, the individual rights of American citizens also remains of paramount importance. The guarantee of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" includes the right to make individual health care decisions while taking into account our responsibility for the common good.
*******************************************************************************
The organizations supporting this statement can be contacted through their websites:
American College of Pediatricians – acpeds.org
Catholic Medical Associations – cathmed.org
Christian Medical and Dental Association – cmda.org
National Association of Catholic Nurses, U.S.A. – nacn-usa.org
Related Topical Articles:
Other Related Topical Content:
Related Publications:
Sorry, we couldn't find any related resources/books on this topic. Please check back often as new topical resources emerge.
Is there embryonic fetal tissue in any current Covid vaccine?
Thank you for your statement. I am a very strong conservative, so I see the value in your sentence above, the guarantee of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” includes the right to make individual health care decisions while taking into account our responsibility for the common good.
The one area that I have been wrestling with in my mind is how the individual who chooses not to have a vaccine should live their life? Are they putting others in the community at risk by going about their daily lives and possibly catching the viruses, and then transmitting that virus to someone else?
I want to be respectful, but yet I want to have a good understanding on how we are to reason and accept individual rights when those individual decisions not to get a vaccine can actually put others at risk that have chosen not to get a vaccine due to medical reasons, and are vulnerable to catch the virus from those who have chosen not to get a vaccine.
Or, the individual who chooses not to get the vaccine, then gets the virus, and then is required to have hospital care and is now using the very medical resources to save their life that could have been entirely avoided in most situations by getting the vaccine.
Thank you for your expert opinion.